IS THIS WHAT JUSTICE LOOKS LIKE UBL? AMERICA??
THE AGENDA BEHIND THE BIN LADEN NEWS EVENT
by KRYPKE
May 5, 2011
Paul Craig Roberts
May 5, 2011
The US government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered. Indeed, the new story put out on Tuesday by White House press secretary Jay Carney bears little resemblance to the original Sunday evening story. The fierce firefight did not occur. Osama bin Laden did not hide behind a woman. Indeed, bin Laden, Carney said, “was not armed.”
The firefight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against al Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the earth.”
Every original story detail has been changed. It wasn’t bin Laden’s wife who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but the wife of an aide. It wasn’t bin Laden’s son, Khalid, who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but son Hamza.
Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war.” But there was no firefight, so where did the “fog of war” come from?
The White House has also had to abandon the story that President Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the SEALs helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no firefight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a firefight. Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theater, there would be no video.
No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed bin Laden, in the absence of a firefight, was murdered by the SEALs with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden,” the operation can only appear as the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?
According to the US government, the terrorist movements of the world operated through bin Laden, “the mastermind.” Thanks to a trigger-happy stupid SEAL, a bullet destroyed the most valuable terrorist information on the planet. Perhaps the SEAL was thinking that he could put a notch on his gun and brag for the rest of his life about being the macho tough guy who killed Osama bin Laden, the most dangerous man on the planet, who outwitted the US and its European and Israeli allies and inflicted humiliation on the “world’s only superpower” on 9/11.
When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require fundamental alternations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans and Vietnamese and enormous profits to the military/security complex.
There is no doubt that the US is sufficiently incompetent to have needlessly killed bin Laden instead of capturing him. But who can believe that the US would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The government’s story is not believable that the government dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released, someday.
As one reader put it in an email to me: “What is really alarming is the increasingly arrogant sloppiness of these lies, as though the government has become so profoundly confident of their ability to deceive people that they make virtually no effort to even appear credible.” http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-agendas-behind-the-bin
OSAMA BIN LADEN DIED IN 2001!!!
Monday, 02 May 2011 08:04
Written by Nashid Abdul-Khaaliq
The information put out by the White House about the killing of Osama Bin Laden is a DELIBERATE LIE! OSAMA BIN LADEN HAS BEEN DEAD SINCE 2001!!! As shown below by reports from Taliban fighters, Osama Bin Laden's family, Heads of States, the CIA, Pakistani Intelligence, Israeli Press, NY Times, and other sources, Osama Bin Laden died of natural causes in Tora Bora in December, 2001.
Why the hoax about his death at this time? It is because the US doesn't need the Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda boogeyman to justify attacking Muslim nations anymore. The Al-Qaeda boogeyman was used successfully to attack Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and other places. But as evidenced in Libya, all that needs to be done now is claim that leaders are killing their people and the US and NATO will have all the justification they need to attack other sovereign nations. We are led to believe that the same murderers of millions of Muslims, plunderers of their lands and haters of Islam have transformed themselves into the saviors of the Muslim masses. We should not be fooled by their appealing propaganda playing on the goodness of our hearts. Their goals are always the same -- steal Muslim countries resources and gain world dominance for Israel's benefit. They see how easy it is to provoke protests in Arab countries, send their mercenaries in to kill the people, blame the killings on Arab leaders and then bomb those countries. They are very selective about this process choosing to execute the complete process in Libya and now itching to do it in Syria on their road to waging war on Iran. Their aim is to weaken and decimate Muslim countries whether friend or foe. Tunisia and Egypt were friendly countries whose cruel, corrupt and self serving leaders did more to please the West than to satisfy the needs of their people. Libya and Syria are not considered friendly countries by the West in the same light as Egypt and Tunisia. Yet friend or foe, both types of leadership has to be toppled because the aim is to leave the Muslim world weak and helpless subject to the dominion of the West. Iraq and Afghanistan are good examples of what they want for the Muslim world after their escapades of bringing "freedom" to the Muslim masses. That "freedom" has only left those countries ruined and destroyed in much worse shape than they were in before their "saviors" from the West invaded.
Besides the reasons given above for announcing that Osama Bin Laden has been killed at this time, there are many others including increasing Obama's chances for re-election to make him look like a hero for killing the world's most wanted "terrorist" during his presidency. It also puts him in a great position to have the whole country unified behind him around the issue of "bringing the 9/11 killers to justice". It also promotes the exposed myth about the false flag 9/11 event being done by Muslims and keeps that fresh on the minds of Americans. The news media is doing non-stop propaganda, pulling out all the stops to broadcast this event in the most excellent manner. Even searches in Google to get information about Osama dying in 2001 is drowned out by a proliferation of hits dealing with him being killed in 2011.
Please check out the information below showing proof of Osama Bin Laden's death in 2001. Make sure to go to the links listed for further verification. After claiming that they have Osama Bin Laden's body and taking DNA tests, the media is now reporting that Osama Bin Laden has been buried at sea. How convenient!!! Well I guess we have no way now of verifying if their claims were true. I think more likely it would have been verifying how false their claim was if anything. As dumb goyim we have to blindly believe our media and government! With Osama Bin Laden's body buried somewhere under the sea we have no way of ascertaining the truth. Their claim in burying Osama so fast is to fulfill the requirements of a Muslim burial as if they respected him so much or the crimes that they associated with Osama had anything to do with Islam. But what Muslim burial tradition were they following?
http://www.ascertainthetruth.com/att/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=500:osama-bin-laden-died-in-2001&catid=58:the-911-event&Itemid=115
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/
http://clifylq.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/434997466/blog
http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/
http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendar
http://www.ljseek.com/Clifylq_s4Zp1.html
http://abatasa2.blogspot.com/2010/03/dajjal-dan-projek-blue-beam.html
posted by Support Border Controls | 3:10 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home